Invalidating factors dating in victoria bc
Of the three principal candidates "“ the other two being Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Judge Diane Wood "“ Judge Garland would also likely have the most immediate influence on the Court.He is well known to the Justices and is likely the most respected by them collectively, particularly the more conservative Justices.
, 528 F.3d 914 (2008) (unanimous panel opinion invalidating FEC regulations as insufficiently stringent to implement Mc Cain-Feingold Act).
The point is not that Judge Garland is conservative. handgun ban, which the Supreme Court subsequently affirmed. I have attempted to review the principal areas of law in which he has decided a significant number of cases that would likely be most relevant to his potential appointment.
None of the candidates under serious consideration is. Garland did not take a formal position on the merits of the case. The most significant area of the law in which Judge Garland's views obviously differ materially from those of Justice Stevens is criminal law.
Garland also had the support of senior administration officials from the Reagan Justice Department, as well as that of Judge Laurence Silberman, who was appointed to the D. He has broad support on both sides of the aisle, and he has few ideologically controversial rulings.
Conservative commentators (see here, here, and here) have expressed support for a potential Garland nomination.
Strictly in terms of the change in the votes of the liberal Justices Stevens and his successor, Judge Garland would be the most different.